Yes. Since 1994, I have reviewed DUI Cases from every possible angle. As a former police officer, prosecutor, and defense attorney, I have arrested, prosecuted, and defended thousands of DUI cases. I know and understand the strengths and weaknesses of the procedures and tactics used by law enforcement officers. Most importantly, I know how to use those weaknesses for the benefit of my client.
Every client is represented by Dean Morgan. We do not push your case off to a less qualified or less experienced attorney.
No. Our fees are based upon a formula that relates to the individual needs of the client. We are very good at what we do. We recognize that our fees may be higher than some and lower than others - but we are certain you will find value here.
No. Our fees are fully set forth and explained in our fee agreement. These include fees that are possible in the future. We believe in transparency.
We offer a fixed-fee services. This means that you do not pay extra for phone calls, emails, etc. Our fees are calculated based upon the following:
I have represented over 1200 individuals charged with DUI.
I ONLY represent DUI Defendants. I do NOT represent traditional criminal defendants (drugs, violence, sex crimes). I do not handle divorce cases or write wills. DUI is all I do.
I am a Standardized Field Sobriety Test Instructor. In addition, I train other attorneys in the area of Advanced Roadside Impaired Driving Enforcement (ARIDE) and Drug Recognition Experts (DRE) through my company, DUI Trainers & Consultants, LLC. I am a recognized authority in the area of pre-arrest testing.
I am a former prosecutor. I know and understand the prosecutor's manner of preparing cases, the goals of the prosecutor, and the best way to utilize those factors for the benefit of my clients.
I am a former law enforcement officer. I was my unit's traffic enforcement/DUI Specialist. I received advanced training in the administration of breath testing as well as Field Sobriety Tests. I personally administered SFST on hundreds of occasions. I know the weaknesses of the SFST at a different level than most attorneys.
Yes. To ensure I am devoting the correct time and energy to my clients' cases, I only accept clients that I know will benefit from my assistance.
Yes. Communication is the key to a successful lawyer-client relationship. Email is preferred because it allows me to respond immediately - even while in court, or on the weekend, or in the evening. If we need to speak personally, I am happy to set up a mutually convenient time to speak by phone or by video. We have a 100% Client Satisfaction Rate for Communication.
No, but Yes. ARD is not your only option. It is the lesser of two evils, but evil can sometimes be avoided. You should ONLY hire a lawyer that will fully and fairly evaluate your case before you make any decision about ARD. We have a history of helping people achieve a better outcome than ARD.
Do NOT hire a lawyer who will do nothing for you but complete some documents and send you on your way. Even if their cheap, if they do not do the work, it is still a rip-off.
Our Goals are - in order:
When you complete the free case evaluation, you will receive a copy of our case results.
We cannot guarantee any particular result since all cases are different. What we can guarantee is that we have the knowledge and experience necessary to ensure that every detail of your case is examined and every defense is pursued.
If an attorney cannot show you successful results, you should not hire him/her.
Yes. Unless prohibited by ARD rules, I request discovery in every case. Where ARD rules prohibit discovery, I review every other aspect of the case to make an informed recommendation based upon my knowledge, training, and experience.
Yes. An attorney should be willing to go to trial. The decision to go to trial is yours and yours alone. My job is to make recommendations and advocate for the best possible outcome. We are successful at trial and at pre-trial negotiation.
Yes. IF it is in your best interest.
Yes. If the facts and law are in your favor, it is possible to have the case dismissed at the preliminary hearing.
Yes. In many cases we are able to reduce charges and/sentences.
the morgan law firm
Copyright © 2012 Morgan Law Firm - All Rights Reserved.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.